[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DB1CBA.3070504@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:31:38 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: california.l.sullivan@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
darren.hart@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
heikki.krogerus@...el.com, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] serial: 8250: Handle invalid UART state
On 08/19/2015 04:12 PM, california.l.sullivan@...el.com wrote:
> From: California Sullivan <california.l.sullivan@...el.com>
>
> The debug UART on the Bay Trail is buggy and will sometimes enter a
> state where there is a Character Timeout interrupt, but the Data
> Ready bit in the Line Status Register is not set, despite there
> being data available in the FIFO. It stays in this state until the
> Receive Buffer is read. Because the 8250 driver does not read the
> Receive Buffer without the Data Ready bit being set, the UART is
> never read once we reach this point, and thus the Character Timeout
> interrupt is never cleared. This makes the driver spin in a loop
> causing multiple "too much work for irq" errors and eventually
> locking up entirely.
LSR doesn't reflect the actual state of the fifo?
So kgdb (CONSOLE_POLL) won't work on these platforms either, right?
Does this happen with only a single byte in the fifo or is it any
number of bytes under the fifo trigger?
> This patch handles the invalid state by setting the Data Ready bit
> in the 'status' variable when the invalid state occurs. This allows
> the receive buffer to be read, which clears the interrupt
> identification register in the UART and brings us back to a correct
> state.
>
> After this patch was submitted for internal comment, a similar bug on
> the HSUARTs of the Bay Trail and Braswell platforms was pointed out.
> On those UARTs, the invalid state mentioned previously is reached for
> some amount of time, cauing the same "too much work for irq" messages,
> but not permanently locking up the UART. This patch has been confirmed
> to solve that issue as well.
>
> We considered solving this by adding a new UART_BUG_ define and
> detecting the buggy UART by either identifying the processor or by
> adding a new PNP device ID to firmware. However, this solution
> would be more complex and have zero performance benefits, as the
> ISR would require a similar 'if' condition to detect and handle the
> bug.
>
> Our main concern with this fix is whether it having a Character
> Timeout with no Data Ready is an invalid state for all UARTs or
> just some. If other UARTs have a Character Timeout without
> immediately flipping the Data Ready bit in the Line Status Register
> for a good reason, setting the Data Ready bit in the 'status'
> variable could have unintended consequences.
I think there is every likelihood of spurious RX timeout interrupts
tripping this patch, sorry.
Unfortunately, I think UART_BUG_ is the only viable possibility.
Or perhaps fixing the port type as PORT_8250 (thus disabling the fifos).
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> Signed-off-by: California Sullivan <california.l.sullivan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> index ea1a8da..078b118 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> @@ -1604,6 +1604,14 @@ int serial8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int iir)
>
> DEBUG_INTR("status = %x...", status);
>
> + /*
> + * Workaround for when there is a character timeout interrupt
> + * but the data ready bit is not set in the Line Status Register.
> + */
> + if ((iir & UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT) &&
> + !(status & (UART_LSR_DR | UART_LSR_BI)))
> + status |= UART_LSR_DR;
> +
> if (status & (UART_LSR_DR | UART_LSR_BI)) {
> if (up->dma)
> dma_err = up->dma->rx_dma(up, iir);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists