[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824134148.GA3394@afzalpc>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:11:48 +0530
From: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>, adaplas@...il.com,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fbdev/riva:change to use generice function to implement
reverse_order()
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:31:13PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>
> i only submit the bit reverse patch for arm / arm64 arch,
yes, saw later git blaming it on you :)
> > Not for this case, but once measured on ARM, iirc, a 32-bit asm bit
> > reversal as compared to doing it in C was taking 1 cycle as opposed to
> > ~225 cycles!, of course writing optimized C could have made it fare
> > better, but still would reach no-way near asm bit reversal.
The above measurement was done not in Linux, rather on a baremetal
code, but seeing the efficient Kernel C implementation, realized that
the gain would not be that much, it would be good to know if there are
measurements for Kernel bitreversal in C & asm (on supported arch)
Regards
afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists