[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824165423.GC2837@jaegeuk-mac02.mot-mobility.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:54:23 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix to release inode correctly
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:40:45PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> In following call stack, if unfortunately we lose all chances to truncate
> inode page in remove_inode_page, eventually we will add the nid allocated
> previously into free nid cache, this nid is with NID_NEW status and with
> NEW_ADDR in its blkaddr pointer:
>
> - f2fs_create
> - f2fs_add_link
> - __f2fs_add_link
> - init_inode_metadata
> - new_inode_page
> - new_node_page
> - set_node_addr(, NEW_ADDR)
> - f2fs_init_acl failed
> - remove_inode_page failed
> - handle_failed_inode
> - remove_inode_page failed
> - iput
> - f2fs_evict_inode
> - remove_inode_page failed
> - alloc_nid_failed cache a nid with valid blkaddr: NEW_ADDR
>
> This may not only cause resource leak of previous inode, but also may cause
> incorrect use of the previous blkaddr which is located in NO.nid node entry
> when this nid is reused by others.
>
> This patch tries to add this inode to orphan list if we fail to truncate
> inode, so that we can obtain a second chance to release it in orphan
> recovery flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 806439f..69827ee 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ int get_dnode_of_data(struct dnode_of_data *, pgoff_t, int);
> int truncate_inode_blocks(struct inode *, pgoff_t);
> int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *, struct page *);
> int wait_on_node_pages_writeback(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
> -void remove_inode_page(struct inode *);
> +int remove_inode_page(struct inode *);
> struct page *new_inode_page(struct inode *);
> struct page *new_node_page(struct dnode_of_data *, unsigned int, struct page *);
> void ra_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index d1b03d0..35aae65 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> nid_t xnid = fi->i_xattr_nid;
> + int err = 0;
>
> /* some remained atomic pages should discarded */
> if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
> @@ -342,11 +343,13 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> i_size_write(inode, 0);
>
> if (F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode))
> - f2fs_truncate(inode, true);
> + err = f2fs_truncate(inode, true);
>
> - f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> - remove_inode_page(inode);
> - f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> + if (!err) {
> + f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> + err = remove_inode_page(inode);
> + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> + }
>
> sb_end_intwrite(inode->i_sb);
> no_delete:
> @@ -362,9 +365,26 @@ no_delete:
> if (is_inode_flag_set(fi, FI_UPDATE_WRITE))
> add_dirty_inode(sbi, inode->i_ino, UPDATE_INO);
> if (is_inode_flag_set(fi, FI_FREE_NID)) {
> - alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> + if (err && err != -ENOENT)
> + alloc_nid_done(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> + else
> + alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> clear_inode_flag(fi, FI_FREE_NID);
> }
> +
> + if (err && err != -ENOENT) {
> + if (!exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)) {
> + /*
> + * get here because we failed to release resource
> + * of inode previously, reminder our user to run fsck
> + * for fixing.
> + */
> + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> + "inode (ino:%lu) resource leak, run fsck "
> + "to fix this issue!", inode->i_ino);
> + }
> + }
> out_clear:
> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_ENCRYPTION
> if (fi->i_crypt_info)
> @@ -377,6 +397,7 @@ out_clear:
> void handle_failed_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> + int err = 0;
>
> clear_nlink(inode);
> make_bad_inode(inode);
> @@ -384,9 +405,27 @@ void handle_failed_inode(struct inode *inode)
>
> i_size_write(inode, 0);
> if (F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode))
> - f2fs_truncate(inode, false);
> + err = f2fs_truncate(inode, false);
> +
> + if (!err)
> + err = remove_inode_page(inode);
>
> - remove_inode_page(inode);
> + /*
> + * if we skip truncate_node in remove_inode_page bacause we failed
> + * before, it's better to find another way to release resource of
> + * this inode (e.g. valid block count, node block or nid). Here we
> + * choose to add this inode to orphan list, so that we can call iput
> + * for releasing in orphan recovery flow.
> + *
> + * Note: we should add inode to orphan list before f2fs_unlock_op()
> + * so we can prevent losing this orphan when encoutering checkpoint
> + * and following suddenly power-off.
> + */
> + if (err && err != -ENOENT) {
> + err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
> + if (!err)
> + add_orphan_inode(sbi, inode->i_ino);
Need this too?
if (err)
set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
Thanks,
> + }
>
> set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_FREE_NID);
> f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 0867325..27d1a74 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -902,17 +902,20 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> * Caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and
> * f2fs_unlock_op().
> */
> -void remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
> +int remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct dnode_of_data dn;
> + int err;
>
> set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, inode->i_ino);
> - if (get_dnode_of_data(&dn, 0, LOOKUP_NODE))
> - return;
> + err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, 0, LOOKUP_NODE);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
>
> - if (truncate_xattr_node(inode, dn.inode_page)) {
> + err = truncate_xattr_node(inode, dn.inode_page);
> + if (err) {
> f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> - return;
> + return err;
> }
>
> /* remove potential inline_data blocks */
> @@ -926,6 +929,7 @@ void remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
>
> /* will put inode & node pages */
> truncate_node(&dn);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> struct page *new_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
> --
> 2.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists