[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824141607.5644d08c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:16:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
fs/btrfs/inode.c
between commit:
da2f0f74cf7d ("Btrfs: add support for blkio controllers")
from the btrfs tree and commit:
b54ffb73cadc ("block: remove bio_get_nr_vecs()")
from the block tree.
I fixed it up (following Chris's example merge - see below) and can
carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/btrfs/inode.c
index bda3c41dc9d5,f924d9a62700..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@@ -7986,12 -7958,7 +7987,11 @@@ out
static struct bio *btrfs_dio_bio_alloc(struct block_device *bdev,
u64 first_sector, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
- int nr_vecs = bio_get_nr_vecs(bdev);
- return btrfs_bio_alloc(bdev, first_sector, BIO_MAX_PAGES, gfp_flags);
+ struct bio *bio;
- bio = btrfs_bio_alloc(bdev, first_sector, nr_vecs, gfp_flags);
++ bio = btrfs_bio_alloc(bdev, first_sector, BIO_MAX_PAGES, gfp_flags);
+ if (bio)
+ bio_associate_current(bio);
+ return bio;
}
static inline int btrfs_lookup_and_bind_dio_csum(struct btrfs_root *root,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists