[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824171144.GB27262@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:11:44 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, axboe@...com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME
inodes
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:51:50AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Bah, I see the problem and indeed it was introduced by commit e79729123f639
> > "writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean". The problem is that
> > we bail out of sync_inodes_sb() if there is no dirty IO. Which is wrong
> > because we have to wait for any outstanding IO (i.e. call wait_sb_inodes())
> > regardless of dirty state! And that also explains why Tejun's patch fixes
> > the problem because it backs out the change to the exit condition in
> > sync_inodes_sb().
>
> Dang, I'm an idiot sandwich.
A question tho, so this means that an inode may contain dirty or
writeback pages w/o the inode being on one of the dirty lists.
Looking at the generic filesystem and writeback code, this doesn't
seem true in general. Is this something xfs specific?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists