[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVJozeJ9R9GgMEVPfJaSJL+J+M3ULu2VXPjrdDqnYGwvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:46:46 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Use 2GB memory block size on large-memory x86-64 systems
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Still stuff going on that I don't understand here. I increased the amount of
> mirrored memory in this machine which moved max_pfn to 0x7560000
> and probe_memory_block_size() picked 512MB as the memory_block_size,
> which seemed plausible.
>
> But my kernel still crashed during boot with this value. :-(
> Forcing the block size to 128M made the system boot.
>
> Maybe all the holes in the e820 map matter too (specifically the
> alignment of the holes)?
Then, what does the E820 look like?
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists