linux-kernel - Re: two RCU torture bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150824200837.GM11078@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:08:37 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	josh@...htriplett.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: two RCU torture bugs

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:56:59AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:50:36 -0700
> 
> > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void)
> >  
> >  #define RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS
> >  
> > -static bool torturing_tasks(void)
> > +static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void)
> >  {
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> 
> This hunk gave a reject for me and I suspect was not intended to be included
> in this fix?

Yeah, I should split that out, thank you for calling it out.  And yes,
I made the patch against my experimental branch, so mileage may vary.

> I'll test the rest of the patch since that appears to be the important part.
> :-)

Thank you!

								Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/