| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1440447223-15945-3-git-send-email-eugene.shatokhin@rosalab.ru>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:13:43 +0300
From: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] usbnet: Fix a race between usbnet_stop() and the BH
The race may happen when a device (e.g. YOTA 4G LTE Modem) is
unplugged while the system is downloading a large file from the Net.
Hardware breakpoints and Kprobes with delays were used to confirm that
the race does actually happen.
The race is on skb_queue ('next' pointer) between usbnet_stop()
and rx_complete(), which, in turn, calls usbnet_bh().
Here is a part of the call stack with the code where the changes to the
queue happen. The line numbers are for the kernel 4.1.0:
*0 __skb_unlink (skbuff.h:1517)
prev->next = next;
*1 defer_bh (usbnet.c:430)
spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
old_state = entry->state;
entry->state = state;
__skb_unlink(skb, list);
spin_unlock(&list->lock);
spin_lock(&dev->done.lock);
__skb_queue_tail(&dev->done, skb);
if (dev->done.qlen == 1)
tasklet_schedule(&dev->bh);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->done.lock, flags);
*2 rx_complete (usbnet.c:640)
state = defer_bh(dev, skb, &dev->rxq, state);
At the same time, the following code repeatedly checks if the queue is
empty and reads these values concurrently with the above changes:
*0 usbnet_terminate_urbs (usbnet.c:765)
/* maybe wait for deletions to finish. */
while (!skb_queue_empty(&dev->rxq)
&& !skb_queue_empty(&dev->txq)
&& !skb_queue_empty(&dev->done)) {
schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(UNLINK_TIMEOUT_MS));
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
netif_dbg(dev, ifdown, dev->net,
"waited for %d urb completions\n", temp);
}
*1 usbnet_stop (usbnet.c:806)
if (!(info->flags & FLAG_AVOID_UNLINK_URBS))
usbnet_terminate_urbs(dev);
As a result, it is possible, for example, that the skb is removed from
dev->rxq by __skb_unlink() before the check
"!skb_queue_empty(&dev->rxq)" in usbnet_terminate_urbs() is made. It is
also possible in this case that the skb is added to dev->done queue
after "!skb_queue_empty(&dev->done)" is checked. So
usbnet_terminate_urbs() may stop waiting and return while dev->done
queue still has an item.
Locking in defer_bh() and usbnet_terminate_urbs() was revisited to avoid
this race.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
---
drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
index e049857..b4cf107 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
@@ -428,12 +428,18 @@ static enum skb_state defer_bh(struct usbnet *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
old_state = entry->state;
entry->state = state;
__skb_unlink(skb, list);
- spin_unlock(&list->lock);
- spin_lock(&dev->done.lock);
+
+ /* defer_bh() is never called with list == &dev->done.
+ * spin_lock_nested() tells lockdep that it is OK to take
+ * dev->done.lock here with list->lock held.
+ */
+ spin_lock_nested(&dev->done.lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
__skb_queue_tail(&dev->done, skb);
if (dev->done.qlen == 1)
tasklet_schedule(&dev->bh);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->done.lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&dev->done.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
return old_state;
}
@@ -749,6 +755,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usbnet_unlink_rx_urbs);
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+static void wait_skb_queue_empty(struct sk_buff_head *q)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ while (!skb_queue_empty(q)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+ schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(UNLINK_TIMEOUT_MS));
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+
// precondition: never called in_interrupt
static void usbnet_terminate_urbs(struct usbnet *dev)
{
@@ -762,14 +782,11 @@ static void usbnet_terminate_urbs(struct usbnet *dev)
unlink_urbs(dev, &dev->rxq);
/* maybe wait for deletions to finish. */
- while (!skb_queue_empty(&dev->rxq)
- && !skb_queue_empty(&dev->txq)
- && !skb_queue_empty(&dev->done)) {
- schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(UNLINK_TIMEOUT_MS));
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- netif_dbg(dev, ifdown, dev->net,
- "waited for %d urb completions\n", temp);
- }
+ wait_skb_queue_empty(&dev->rxq);
+ wait_skb_queue_empty(&dev->txq);
+ wait_skb_queue_empty(&dev->done);
+ netif_dbg(dev, ifdown, dev->net,
+ "waited for %d urb completions\n", temp);
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(&dev->wait, &wait);
}
--
2.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists