| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:41:29 -0700 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Build failure due to Intel PT Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [acme@...nel.org] wrote: | | > Besides adding a 'default' case, can this file be skipped when building on | > non-x86 architectures? | | Not sure, what about processing a perf.data file generated on a x86 | system using a PowerPC workstation? I am not sure either. Is that well supported? Anyway, I tried to build with WERROR=0 and get link errors like: linux-acme.git/tools/perf/perf-obj/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_branch_sample': sources/linux-acme.git/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:871: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time' linux-acme.git/tools/perf/perf-obj/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_sample': sources/linux-acme.git/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:915: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time' sources/linux-acme.git/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:962: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time' linux-acme.git/tools/perf/perf-obj/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_process_event': sources/linux-acme.git/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:1454: undefined reference to `perf_time_to_tsc' ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists