[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150824225458.GQ28944@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:54:58 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, axboe@...com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME
inodes
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:45:35PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> That isn't true for pages being dirtied through set_page_dirty().
> It's guaranteed that a dirty inode remains on one of the b_* lists
> till there's no dirty page and writeback is complete.
I got confused here. inodes get removed from b_* once all IOs are
issued.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists