[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DBA477.5020608@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:10:47 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@...escale.com>, scottwood@...escale.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
lauraa@...eaurora.org, X.xie@...escale.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, leoli@...escale.com, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with
bytes-alignment to genalloc
On 08/24/2015 02:31 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
> Bytes alignment is required to manage some special RAM,
> so add gen_pool_first_fit_align to genalloc,
> meanwhile add gen_pool_alloc_data to pass data to
> gen_pool_first_fit_align(modify gen_pool_alloc as a wrapper)
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@...escale.com>
> ---
> Changes for v6:
> - patches set v6 include a new patch because of using
> - genalloc to manage QE MURAM, patch 0001 is the new
> - patch, adding bytes alignment for allocation for use.
>
> include/linux/genalloc.h | 23 +++++++++++++++----
> lib/genalloc.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/genalloc.h b/include/linux/genalloc.h
> index 1ccaab4..55da07e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/genalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/genalloc.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>
> struct device;
> struct device_node;
> +struct gen_pool;
>
> /**
> * Allocation callback function type definition
> @@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ typedef unsigned long (*genpool_algo_t)(unsigned long *map,
> unsigned long size,
> unsigned long start,
> unsigned int nr,
> - void *data);
> + void *data, struct gen_pool *pool);
>
> /*
> * General purpose special memory pool descriptor.
> @@ -73,6 +74,13 @@ struct gen_pool_chunk {
> unsigned long bits[0]; /* bitmap for allocating memory chunk */
> };
>
> +/*
> + * gen_pool data descriptor for gen_pool_first_fit_align.
> + */
> +struct genpool_data_align {
> + int align; /* alignment by bytes for starting address */
> +};
> +
(sorry for chiming in late, I've been traveling)
Is there an advantage here to wrapping this in a structure instead of just
passing a pointer to an align integer?
Thanks,
Laura
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists