[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DC0900.3010500@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:19:44 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf sched: Implement 'perf sched runtime' command
On 8/24/15 11:11 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> +static int perf_sched__read_runtime_events(struct perf_sched *sched)
> +{
> + const struct perf_evsel_str_handler handlers[] = {
> + { "sched:sched_switch", process_sched_switch_event, },
> + { "sched:sched_stat_runtime", process_sched_runtime_event, },
> + { "sched:sched_stat_sleep", process_sched_sleep_event, },
> + { "sched:sched_stat_wait", process_sched_wait_event, },
> + { "sched:sched_stat_iowait", process_sched_iowait_event, },
> + { "sched:sched_migrate_task", process_sched_migrate_task_event, },
> + };
I like the concept (obviously since I have invested so much time in
other solutions). But... you cannot rely on the sched_stat tracepoints
being enabled. I believe it is a performance hit to have
CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS enabled and distributions (e.g., Fedora) do not have
it enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists