[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150825092441.GA24131@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:24:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
hierarchy
* Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Anyways, a point here is that threads of the same process competing
> > isn't a new problem. There are many ways to make those threads play
> > nice as the application itself often has to be involved anyway,
> > especially for something like qemu which is heavily involved in
> > provisioning resources.
>
> It's certainly not a new problem, but it's a real one, and it's
> _hard_. You're proposing removing the best known solution.
Also, just to make sure this is resolved properly, I'm NAK-ing the current
scheduler bits in this series:
NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
until all of pjt's API design concerns are resolved. This is conceptual, it is not
a 'we can fix it later' detail.
Tejun, please keep me Cc:-ed to future versions of this series so that I can lift
the NAK if things get resolved.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists