[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx=kExyKAoGW4ciWHHxGNosNR0VdvHHrSqeo7RH1rNOXgig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:46:08 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 5/5] mtd: atmel-quadspi: add driver for
Atmel QSPI controller
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 07:04:38 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>
> Hi!
>
>> Le 24/08/2015 13:03, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>> > On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:14:00 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> >> This driver add support to the new Atmel QSPI controller embedded into
>> >> sama5d2x SoCs. It expects a NOR memory to be connected to the QSPI
>> >> controller.
>
> [...]
>
>> >> + /* Compute address parameters */
>> >> + switch (cmd->enable.bits.address) {
>> >> + case 4:
>> >> + ifr |= QSPI_IFR_ADDRL;
>> >> + /*break;*/ /* fallback to the 24bit address case */
>> >
>> > What's this commented out bit of code for ? :-)
>>
>> I just wanted to stress out there was no missing "break;".
>> I've reworded the comment to:
>> /* No "break" on purpose: fallback to the 24bit address case. */
>
> Oh, the address is in bytes . I see, yes, it makes sense to be more
> explicit here about the purpose of the fallback. I think this change
> in the comment will make it easier for everyone who comes back in a
> few years and reads this code.
I think you are looking for the term "(switch case) fallthrough", not
"fallback". "Fallback" makes it sound like there is something missing,
or an invalid state.
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists