[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DC4192.6060906@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:21:06 +0200
From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
To: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
<nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 5/5] mtd: atmel-quadspi: add driver for
Atmel QSPI controller
Le 25/08/2015 11:46, Jonas Gorski a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 07:04:38 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Le 24/08/2015 13:03, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>>>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:14:00 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>>>>> This driver add support to the new Atmel QSPI controller embedded into
>>>>> sama5d2x SoCs. It expects a NOR memory to be connected to the QSPI
>>>>> controller.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> + /* Compute address parameters */
>>>>> + switch (cmd->enable.bits.address) {
>>>>> + case 4:
>>>>> + ifr |= QSPI_IFR_ADDRL;
>>>>> + /*break;*/ /* fallback to the 24bit address case */
>>>>
>>>> What's this commented out bit of code for ? :-)
>>>
>>> I just wanted to stress out there was no missing "break;".
>>> I've reworded the comment to:
>>> /* No "break" on purpose: fallback to the 24bit address case. */
>>
>> Oh, the address is in bytes . I see, yes, it makes sense to be more
>> explicit here about the purpose of the fallback. I think this change
>> in the comment will make it easier for everyone who comes back in a
>> few years and reads this code.
>
> I think you are looking for the term "(switch case) fallthrough", not
> "fallback". "Fallback" makes it sound like there is something missing,
> or an invalid state.
>
>
> Jonas
>
will be modified in the next series, thanks for the review!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists