linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: acpi: Generic function for setting up PCI device DMA coherency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55DC4D6D.207@amd.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:11:41 +0700
From:	"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"Hanjun Guo" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: acpi: Generic function for setting up PCI device DMA
 coherency

Hi Bjorn,

On 8/25/2015 3:14 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> wrote:
>
>>>> commit 84cfb2213cd400fef227ec0d7829ec4e12895da9
>>>> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>>>> Date:   Thu Aug 13 19:49:52 2015 -0500
>>>>
>>>>       ACPI / scan: Rename acpi_check_dma() to acpi_dma_is_coherent()
>>>>
>>>>       The name "acpi_check_dma()" doesn't give any much indication about
>>>> what
>>>>       exactly it checks.  The function also returns information both as a
>>>> normal
>>>>       return value and as the "bool *coherent" return parameter.  But
>>>> "*coherent"
>>>>       doesn't actually give any extra information: it is unchanged when
>>>> returning
>>>>       false and set to true when returning true.
>>>>
>>>>       Rename acpi_check_dma() to acpi_dma_is_coherent() so the callers
>>>> read more
>>>>       naturally.  Drop the return parameter and just use the function
>>>> return
>>>>       value.
>>>>
>>>>       Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>>
>>
>> This was because, at one point, we wanted to be able to differentiate
>> between the case _CCA=0 and missing _CCA in ARM64, where we would support
>> DMA (using arch-specific cache maintenance) if _CCA=0, and disable DMA when
>> missing _CCA on ARM64.
>>
>> It seems like the logic is now required (please see
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg62735.html). So,
>> we would need the true/false return, and the coherent variable to be able to
>> differentiate between the two cases.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think.
>
> It's hard for me to comment without seeing the actual patches.  I
> think returning two values (_CCA-seen and coherent) is a confusing
> interface.

Ok. Let me simplify this and send out V2.

Thanks,
Suravee

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/