[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+oExmQPR9UuJy8oVaL_DzZ70kSP6ftS+ZhyFSs7hyxsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:50:11 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>, wangnan0 <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@...dia.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: probes: Don't stop the machine if we're in the debugger
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 04:58 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> If we're in kgdb then the machine is already stopped. Trying to stop
>> it again will cause us to try to sleep, which is not allowed while in
>> kgdb. To avoid this problem, only stop the machine when we're not in
>> kgdb.
>>
>> Reported-by: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@...dia.com>
>> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
I actually suggested using in_atomic_preempt_off() which is I think a
better catch-all. Could you use that instead, please?
-Kees
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>
>
> Can you add the backtrace?
>
>> arch/arm/kernel/patch.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> index 69bda1a..abf30ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/kgdb.h>
>> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
>> @@ -124,6 +125,9 @@ void __kprobes patch_text(void *addr, unsigned int
>> insn)
>> .insn = insn,
>> };
>> - stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL);
>> + /* Stop machine before patching; but not if in the debugger */
>> + if (unlikely(in_dbg_master()))
>> + patch_text_stop_machine(&patch);
>> + else
>> + stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL);
>> }
>
>
> Perhaps it would be better to add a different function for the kgdb call
> site? Then it's explicit what's going on without us having to figure out
> when in_dbg_master() is true.
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists