[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67EhfgtbdLyFLd8xd6MMAnG4MGMvGLUTZxh=ag7XghvyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:55:28 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Add missing header for 'bool' definition to clk-conf.h
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 08/18, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> of_clk_set_defaults uses the type 'bool', but clk-conf.h does not
>> include its definition.
>>
>> This results in a compile error when only clk-conf.h is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> Why is stable Cc-ed? Is there some sort of compilation failure on
> stable kernels?
There isn't for now. Though I don't see why we shouldn't fix this for
stable kernels as well. It's possible other people or third-party
vendors working with stable/LTS kernels (Android?) may run into it.
I'm perfectly fine with not Cc-ing stable. It just seemed like the
right thing to do.
Regards
ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists