[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMj2M2GBE+KgkUw1PeWQEbzv0spkx58WfVDoGyPYDQGC4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:05:45 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: uniphier: add outer cache support and rework SMP operations
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
>
> 2015-08-25 6:47 GMT+09:00 Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>> 1/3: add outer cache support
>>> 2/3: rework SMP operations
>>> 3/3: add device tree nodes
>>
>> Timing of this is unfortunate, please resend after 4.3-rc1 is out and
>> we can queue it up.
>
> Given that rc8 is out and the merge window has been delayed,
> is it still too late for 4.3-rc1?
Yes.
>>> Because 2/3 highly depends on 1/3, I hope whole of this series
>>> is applied to ARM-SOC tree.
>>
>> Review or acked-by from Russell would be appreciated in that case.
>>
>>> Olof,
>>> From this series, I am using "ARM: uniphier:" rather than "ARM: UniPhier:"
>>> for the subject prefixes because I noticed you often rephased so when you
>>> applied my patches.
>>> Are sub-arch names in lower cases preferable in subject prefixes?
>>
>> If you look at "git log --no-merges --oneline arch/arm/mach-*" you'll
>> see that most platforms use either all-caps or all-lowercase.
>
> I see.
>
> But, we use "UniPhier" (with only U and P capitalized) in our official
> documents.
That's OK, others surely capitalize their platform names too in
documentation. Some of them even have funkier capitalization than
that, such as "SPEAr".
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists