[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150826072656.GA19305@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:26:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] perf: Introduce extended syscall error reporting
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> ... but back then I didn't feel like complicating an error recovery ABI for the
> needs of the 1%, robust error handling is all about simplicity: if it's not
> simple, tools won't use it.
And note that it needs to be 'simple' in two places for usage to grow naturally:
- the usage site in the kernel
- the tooling side that recovers the information.
That's why I think that such a form:
return err_str(-EINVAL, "x86/perf: CPU does not support precise sampling");
is obviously simple on the kernel side as it returns -EINVAL, and is very simple
on the tooling side as well, if we are allowed to extend prctl().
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists