[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DD748E.8000905@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:10:54 +0900
From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
To: <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <acme@...nel.org>, <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86: Add Intel PT logger
On 2015/07/29 15:08, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> This patch provides Intel PT logging feature. When system boots with a
>> parameter "intel_pt_log", log buffers for Intel PT are allocated and
>> logging starts, then processor flow information is written in the log
>> buffer by hardware like flight recorder. This is very helpful to
>> investigate a cause of kernel panic.
>>
>> The log buffer size is specified by the parameter
>> "intel_pt_log_buf_len=<size>". This buffer is used as circular buffer,
>> therefore old events are overwritten by new events.
>
> [skip]
>
>> +static void enable_pt(int enable)
>> +{
>> + u64 ctl;
>> +
>> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, ctl);
>
> Ideally, you shouldn't need this rdmsr(), because in this code you
> should know exactly which ctl bits you need set when you enable.
>
>> +
>> + if (enable)
>> + ctl |= RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN;
>> + else
>> + ctl &= ~RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN;
>> +
>> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, ctl);
>> +}
>
> But the bigger problem with this approach is that it duplicates the
> existing driver's functionality and some of the code, which just makes
> it harder to maintain amoung other things.
>
> Instead, we should be able to do use the existing perf functionality to
> enable the system-wide tracing, so that it goes through the
> driver. Another thing to remember is that you'd also need some of the
> sideband data (vm mappings, context switches) to be able to properly
> decode the trace, which also can come from perf. And it'd also be much
> less code. The only missing piece is the code that would allocate the
> ring buffer for such events.
Alexander,
I checked perf code to find out what kinds of information are needed as
side-band data. It seems that the following two events are used.
- sched:sched_switch
- dummy(PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY)
So, what I need to do is adding kernel counter for three events
(intel_pt, sched:sched_switch, dummy). My understanding is correct?
Thanks,
Takao Indoh
>
> Something like:
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event *, perf_kdump_event);
>
> static struct perf_event_attr perf_kdump_attr;
>
> ...
>
> static int perf_kdump_init(void)
> {
> struct perf_event *event;
> int cpu;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> event = perf_create_kernel_counter(&perf_kdump_attr,
> cpu, NULL,
> NULL, NULL);
>
> ...
>
> ret = rb_alloc_kernel(event, perf_kdump_data_size, perf_kdump_aux_size);
>
> ...
>
> per_cpu(perf_kdump_event, cpu) = event;
> }
> put_online_cpus();
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists