[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DD80C6.7030400@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:03:02 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.2-rc8
On 24.08.15 10:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> JFYI, when comparing v4.2-rc8[1] to v4.2-rc7[3], the summaries are:
>> - build errors: +4/-7
>
> 4 regressions:
> + /home/kisskb/slave/src/include/linux/kvm_host.h: error: array
> subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]: => 430:19
> (arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c: In function 'kvmppc_mmu
> _book3s_64_tlbie':)
>
> powerpc-randconfig (seen before in a v3.15-rc1 build?)
I'm not quite sure what's going wrong here. The code in question does
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, v, vcpu->kvm)
kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush(v, va >> 12, mask);
and IIUC the thing we're potentially running over on would be
kvm->vcpus[i]. But that one is bound by the kvm_for_each_vcpu loop, no?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists