linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150826080121.6612852b@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:01:21 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To:	Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Cc:	bfields@...ldses.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op
 '->'

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:22:25 +0530
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Thanks for your review comments.
> 
> On 26/08/2015:06:31:03 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34:19 +0530
> > Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >  	TP_fast_assign(
> > >  		__entry->xprt = xprt;
> > > +		__entry->addr =
> > > +			xprt ? (struct sockaddr *)&xprt->xpt_remote : NULL;
> > 
> > I don't get it. It's not safe to save a pointer to xprt and dereference
> > that in a tracepoint (and I understand why that is), but it is safe to
> > save a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt? Shouldn't you be
> > saving a copy of the entire sockaddr struct instead?
> 
> As far as "saving of a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt" is
> concerned, I do not see any issue.
> 
> Its your take that what you want to print as your tracepoint print output. I
> might be missing something..  However, I do not see any value addition in
> printing address of a structure(located in ring buffer) where xprt->xpt_remote
> has been copied.
> 
> > 
> > Ahh, ok -- I think I see the confusion. %pIScp does not print the
> > address of the sockaddr, but instead dereferences the pointer and
> > prints it as a formatted address string. See pointer() in
> > lib/vsprintf.c. You do want to save off a copy of the structure instead.
> 
> In my opinion, saving of structure would only be necessary if you want to access
> element of the structure xprt->xpt_remote.
> 
> ~Pratyush

That's exactly what %pI does. Look at the pointer() function.

For this tracepoint, we want to print out the address of the remote end
of the socket. That's saved in xprt->xpt_remote.

%pIScp doesn't print the pointer's address. It dereferences that
pointer and formats and prints the socket address that it points to. If
you pass a NULL pointer into anything that uses %pI, it's going to oops.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/