[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440595268.15478.47.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:21:08 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com" <arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] ARCv2: perf: Support sampling events using
overflow interrupts
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 15:12 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:20:20PM +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > @@ -295,6 +317,16 @@ static int arc_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > }
> >
> > write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_PCT_INDEX, idx);
> > +
> > + arc_pmu->act_counter[idx] = event;
> > +
> > + if (is_sampling_event(event)) {
> > + /* Mimic full counter overflow as other arches do */
> > + write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_PCT_INT_CNTL, (u32)arc_pmu->max_period);
> > + write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_PCT_INT_CNTH,
> > + (arc_pmu->max_period >> 32));
> > + }
> > +
>
> pmu::add should call pmu::start when PERF_EF_START, without that it
> should not start the counter, only schedule it.
>
> (although currently all pmu::add() calls will have EF_START set)
And that's what we do, don't we?
----------------------->8-----------------------
if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
arc_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
----------------------->8-----------------------
-Alexey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists