[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150826173000.GG10728@bivouac.eciton.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:30:00 +0100
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, msalter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: use core efi=debug instead of uefi_debug
command line parameter
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:24:55PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug, at 02:24:57PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > Now that we have an efi=debug command line option in the core code, use
> > this instead of the arm64-specific uefi_debug option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/arm/uefi.txt | 2 --
> > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 19 +++++--------------
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> Are there no concerns with backwards-compatibility here? I expected
> this patch to internally convert uefi_debug to efi=debug if old boot
> loaders, kernel config, etc specify it.
>
> Is that something that can be safely ignored?
Since it is purely a debug feature, I opted to just drop it.
I don't have strong feelings, and it could certainly be kept as an
arm64-only alias (but setting the EFI_DBG flag) if others disagree.
/
Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists