[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150826034622.GH13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:46:22 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: smd: Use correct remote processor ID
On Tue 25 Aug 13:36 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch fixes SMEM addressing issues when remote processors need to use
> secure SMEM partitions.
>
Right, sorry for missing that remote_pid and edge_pid isn't in sync...
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt | 7 +++++++
> drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> index f65c76d..3b60702 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The edge is described by the following properties:
> Definition: the identifier of the remote processor in the smd channel
> allocation table
>
> +- qcom,remote-pid:
> + Usage: required
I would like to see this being optional, as this is not a property that
matters on any of the 32-bit systems (perhaps 8084?).
> + Value type: <u32>
> + Definition: the identifier for the remote processor as known by the rest
> + of the system.
> +
> = SMD DEVICES
>
> In turn, subnodes of the "edges" represent devices tied to SMD channels on that
> @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ The following example represents a smd node, with one edge representing the
> interrupts = <0 168 1>;
> qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
> qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
> + qcom,remote-pid = <0xffffffff>;
This looks messy, so let's make the property optional and make its
absence indicate the "global partition".
>
> rpm_requests {
> compatible = "qcom,rpm-msm8974";
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
[..]
> @@ -1184,6 +1187,13 @@ static int qcom_smd_parse_edge(struct device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + key = "qcom,remote-pid";
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, key, &edge->remote_pid);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "edge missing %s property\n", key);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
So I suggest you changing this to:
edge->remote_pid = QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY;
of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,remote-pid", &edge->remote_pid);
> syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "qcom,ipc", 0);
> if (!syscon_np) {
> dev_err(dev, "no qcom,ipc node\n");
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists