linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1440632135.14237.70.camel@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:35:35 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 17:29 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 01:16 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 10:16 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > ACPI 6.0 NFIT Memory Device State Flags in Table 5-129 defines
> > > > > bit 3 as follows.
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Bit [3] set to 1 to indicate that the Memory Device is observed
> > > > >   to be not armed prior to OSPM hand off. A Memory Device is
> > > > >   considered armed if it is able to accept persistent writes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This bit is currently defined as ACPI_NFIT_MEM_ARMED, which can be
> > > > > confusing as if the Memory Device is armed when this bit is set.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Change the name to ACPI_NFIT_MEM_NOT_ARMED per the spec.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> > > > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > > > > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> > > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/acpi/nfit.c              |    6 +++---
> > > > >  drivers/acpi/nfit.h              |    2 +-
> > > > >  include/acpi/actbl1.h            |    2 +-
> > > > 
> > > > This file "include/acpi/actbl1.h" is owned by the ACPICA project so
> > > > any changes need to come through them.  But that said, I'm not sure 
> > > > we
> > > > need friendly names at this level.
> > > 
> > > I think the name is misleading, but I agree with the process and this 
> > > patch2 can be dropped.  It'd be nice if the ACPICA project can pick it 
> > > up later when they have a chance, though.
> > 
> > A good way to cause that to happen would be to send a patch to the
> > ACPICA development list + maintainers as per MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Oh, I see.  I did run get_maintainer.pl for this patch, but 
> devel@...ica.org did not come out in output...  So, I did not realize this 
> email list.

Sorry, it was listed in the output.  I was simply blinded... :-(

$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl patches-nd-flags/02*
 :
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org (open list:LIBNVDIMM BLK: MMIO-APERTURE DRIVER)
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
devel@...ica.org (open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA))

Thanks!
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/