linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm, procfs: Display VmAnon, VmFile and VmShm in /proc/pid/status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55DEBAC3.4050500@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:22:43 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm, procfs: Display VmAnon, VmFile and VmShm in
 /proc/pid/status

On 08/05/2015 03:21 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 05.08.2015 16:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
>>
>> It's currently inconvenient to retrieve MM_ANONPAGES value from status
>> and statm files and there is no way to separate MM_FILEPAGES and
>> MM_SHMEMPAGES. Add VmAnon, VmFile and VmShm lines in /proc/<pid>/status
>> to solve these issues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> ---
>>    Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 10 +++++++++-
>>    fs/proc/task_mmu.c                 | 13 +++++++++++--
>>    2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> index fcf67c7..fadd1b3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ For example, to get the status information of a process, all you have to do is
>>      VmLck:         0 kB
>>      VmHWM:       476 kB
>>      VmRSS:       476 kB
>> +  VmAnon:      352 kB
>> +  VmFile:      120 kB
>> +  VmShm:         4 kB
>>      VmData:      156 kB
>>      VmStk:        88 kB
>>      VmExe:        68 kB
>> @@ -229,7 +232,12 @@ Table 1-2: Contents of the status files (as of 4.1)
>>     VmSize                      total program size
>>     VmLck                       locked memory size
>>     VmHWM                       peak resident set size ("high water mark")
>> - VmRSS                       size of memory portions
>> + VmRSS                       size of memory portions. It contains the three
>> +                             following parts (VmRSS = VmAnon + VmFile + VmShm)
>> + VmAnon                      size of resident anonymous memory
>> + VmFile                      size of resident file mappings
>> + VmShm                       size of resident shmem memory (includes SysV shm,
>> +                             mapping of tmpfs and shared anonymous mappings)
>
> "Vm" is an acronym for Virtual Memory, but all these are not virtual.
> They are real pages. Let's leave VmRSS as is and invent better prefix
> for new fields: something like "Mem", "Pg", or no prefix at all.

No prefix would be IMHO confusing. Mem could work, but it's not exactly 
consistent with the rest. I think only VmPeak and VmSize talk about 
virtual memory. The rest of existing counters is about physical memory 
being mapped into that virtual memory or consumed by supporting it (PTE, 
PMD) or swapped out. I don't see any difference for the new counters 
here, they would just stand out oddly with some new prefix IMHO.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/