linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwrseq: bind pinctrl pins before using the gpios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpZaeBbfN05HoHGafbkEJ1k6ZCNn+o5w6HKUzJ7Q0irPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:48:58 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwrseq: bind pinctrl pins before using the gpios

+ Stephen Rothwell

On 25 August 2015 at 14:06, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 17 August 2015 at 13:58, Srinivas Kandagatla
> <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Some of the pin-controllers like the Qualcomms "qcom,pm8921", which
>> require a pinconf to be setup to use pins as gpios. Using the pins
>> directly without pinconf setup would result in incorrect output voltage
>> or load settings. On the other hand pwrseq code does not configure the
>> pinctrl by default as it does not go thru the driver core.
>>
>> This patch adds a call to pinctrl_bind_pins() to bind pins which
>> are going to be used as gpios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks, applied for next! I add the "mmc:" to the prefix of the commit
> message header.

This went in too quickly, my bad!

The kbuild test robot reports an error when building i386 with
allmodconfig, so I will drop this patch from my next branch.
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all/2015-August/011806.html

Moreover I have some more comment around the patch, see below.

>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.c
>> index 4c1d175..6e5d8b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/devinfo.h>
>>
>>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>
>> @@ -65,6 +66,10 @@ int mmc_pwrseq_alloc(struct mmc_host *host)
>>                 goto err;
>>         }
>>
>> +       ret = pinctrl_bind_pins(&pdev->dev);

pinctrl_bind_bins() uses devm_* functions and that's not going to work
as the used device here isn't being probed/released.

Instead you need to use the *non* devm_pinctrl_*() APIs, such as
pinctrl_get|put() etc.

>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto err;
>> +
>>         match = mmc_pwrseq_find(np);
>>         if (IS_ERR(match)) {
>>                 ret = PTR_ERR(match);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/