linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/7] scsi: storvsc: Untangle the storage protocol negotiation from the vmbus protocol negotiation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1440639625.2196.100.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:40:25 -0700
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, ohering@...e.com,
	jbottomley@...allels.com, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, apw@...onical.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
	jasowang@...hat.com, Keith Mange <keith.mange@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 3/7] scsi: storvsc: Untangle the storage
 protocol negotiation from the vmbus protocol negotiation.

On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 08:43 -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> From: Keith Mange <keith.mange@...rosoft.com>
> 
> Currently we are making decisions based on vmbus protocol versions
> that have been negotiated; use storage potocol versions instead.
> 
> Tested-by: Alex Ng <alexng@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Mange <keith.mange@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> index 5f9d133..f29871e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> @@ -56,14 +56,18 @@
>   * V1 RC > 2008/1/31:  2.0
>   * Win7: 4.2
>   * Win8: 5.1
> + * Win8.1: 6.0
> + * Win10: 6.2
>   */
>  
>  #define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(MAJOR_, MINOR_)	((((MAJOR_) & 0xff) << 8) | \
>  						(((MINOR_) & 0xff)))
>  
> +#define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN6	VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(2, 0)
>  #define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN7	VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(4, 2)
>  #define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN8	VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(5, 1)
> -
> +#define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN8_1	VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(6, 0)
> +#define VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION_WIN10	VMSTOR_PROTO_VERSION(6, 2)
>  
>  /*  Packet structure describing virtual storage requests. */
>  enum vstor_packet_operation {
> @@ -205,6 +209,46 @@ struct vmscsi_request {
>  
> 
>  /*
> + * The list of storage protocols in order of preference.
> + */
> +struct vmstor_protocol {
> +	int protocol_version;
> +	int sense_buffer_size;
> +	int vmscsi_size_delta;
> +};
> +
> +#define VMSTOR_NUM_PROTOCOLS    5
> +
> +const struct vmstor_protocol vmstor_protocols[VMSTOR_NUM_PROTOCOLS] = {

Sparse doesn't like this not being static:

  CHECK   drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c:221:30: warning: symbol 'vmstor_protocols'
was not declared. Should it be static?
 
I fixed it up.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/