linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/15] hwmon, fam15h_power: refactor attributes for dynamically added

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:46:18 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker 
	<fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] hwmon, fam15h_power: refactor attributes for dynamically
 added

On 08/27/2015 01:07 AM, Huang Rui wrote:
> Attributes depend on the CPU model the driver gets loaded on.
> Therefore, add those attributes dynamically at init time. This is more
> flexible to control the different attributes on different platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> index 820adf1..65ffb06 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>   #define REG_TDP_RUNNING_AVERAGE		0xe0
>   #define REG_TDP_LIMIT3			0xe8
>
> +#define FAM15H_MIN_POWER_GROUPS		2

This should be something like FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS.
There is only one group with a variable number of attributes.

> +
>   struct fam15h_power_data {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>   	unsigned int tdp_to_watts;
> @@ -93,29 +95,35 @@ static ssize_t show_power_crit(struct device *dev,
>   }
>   static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_crit, S_IRUGO, show_power_crit, NULL);
>
> -static umode_t fam15h_power_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> -				       struct attribute *attr,
> -				       int index)
> +static struct attribute_group fam15h_power_group;
> +__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fam15h_power);
> +
> +static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   {
> -	/* power1_input is only reported for Fam15h, Models 00h-0fh */
> -	if (attr == &dev_attr_power1_input.attr &&
> -	   (boot_cpu_data.x86 != 0x15 || boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 0xf))
> -		return 0;
> +	int n = FAM15H_MIN_POWER_GROUPS;
> +	struct attribute **fam15h_power_attrs;
>
> -	return attr->mode;
> -}
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> +		n += 1;
>
> -static struct attribute *fam15h_power_attrs[] = {
> -	&dev_attr_power1_input.attr,
> -	&dev_attr_power1_crit.attr,
> -	NULL
> -};
> +	fam15h_power_attrs = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, n,
> +					  sizeof(*fam15h_power_attrs),
> +					  GFP_KERNEL);
>
> -static const struct attribute_group fam15h_power_group = {
> -	.attrs = fam15h_power_attrs,
> -	.is_visible = fam15h_power_is_visible,
> -};
> -__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fam15h_power);
> +	if (!fam15h_power_attrs) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to alloc fam15h_power_attrs\n");

The infrastructure already dumps a message for memory allocation errors.
No need for another one.

> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	n = 0;
> +	fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_crit.attr;
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> +		fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_input.attr;
> +
> +	fam15h_power_group.attrs = fam15h_power_attrs;
> +
Assuming this will be called for each CPU in a multi-CPU system,
this will be overwritten each time a new CPU comes online.
fam15h_power_group and fam15h_power_groups probably need to be moved
into fam15h_power_data to avoid that. In essence, there should only
be read-only static variables. Everything else should be allocated.

> +	return 0;
> +}
>
>   static bool should_load_on_this_node(struct pci_dev *f4)
>   {
> @@ -221,6 +229,9 @@ static int fam15h_power_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>   	if (!data)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>
> +	if (fam15h_power_init_attrs(pdev))
> +		return -ENOMEM;

This should return the error code from fam15h_power_init_attrs().

> +
>   	fam15h_power_init_data(pdev, data);
>   	data->pdev = pdev;
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/