lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:06 -0400 From: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@...com> To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition On 8/27/2015 1:04 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@...com> wrote: >> I know this seems like a nit but we've going to live with this stuff for >> a long time. > > Along those lines, Bob just came by my office and gave me a decisive > argument that I think trumps my ABI concerns, and one I'd be willing > to argue for 4.2 inclusion. Some BIOS implementers may do the work to > get the polarity correct others may just read the flag name and get it > wrong. Once that happens the field loses all meaning regardless of > whether Linux interprets it correctly. BIOS developers, BIOS testers, and the OS folks working with those teams will be grateful. Thanks, -- ljk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists