[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DF4432.6080300@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:06 -0400
From: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@...com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition
On 8/27/2015 1:04 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@...com> wrote:
>> I know this seems like a nit but we've going to live with this stuff for
>> a long time.
>
> Along those lines, Bob just came by my office and gave me a decisive
> argument that I think trumps my ABI concerns, and one I'd be willing
> to argue for 4.2 inclusion. Some BIOS implementers may do the work to
> get the polarity correct others may just read the flag name and get it
> wrong. Once that happens the field loses all meaning regardless of
> whether Linux interprets it correctly.
BIOS developers, BIOS testers, and the OS folks working with those teams
will be grateful.
Thanks,
-- ljk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists