lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150827172746.GA27452@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:27:46 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] x86, amd: add accessor for number of cores per
 compute unit

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:07:40PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> Add an accessor function amd_get_cores_per_cu() which returns the
> number of cores per compute unit.
> 
> In a subsequent patch, we will use this function in fam15h_power
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index 19577dd..831ad682 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -810,6 +810,7 @@ static inline int mpx_disable_management(void)
>  
>  extern u16 amd_get_nb_id(int cpu);
>  extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void);
> +extern u32 amd_get_cores_per_cu(void);
>  
>  static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index 51ad2af..8ab939a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>   */
>  static u32 nodes_per_socket = 1;
>  
> +/* cores_per_cu: stores the number of cores per compute unit */
> +static u32 cores_per_cu = 1;
> +
Is this value going to be constant even if there are multiple CPUs
in the system ? In other words, if there are multiple CPUs, do
they always have to have the same number of cores per CU ?

Thanks,
Guenter

>  static inline int rdmsrl_amd_safe(unsigned msr, unsigned long long *p)
>  {
>  	u32 gprs[8] = { 0 };
> @@ -298,7 +301,6 @@ static int nearby_node(int apicid)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
> -	u32 cores_per_cu = 1;
>  	u8 node_id;
>  	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
> @@ -313,7 +315,6 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		/* get compute unit information */
>  		smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1;
>  		c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xff;
> -		cores_per_cu += ((ebx >> 8) & 3);
>  	} else if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {
>  		u64 value;
>  
> @@ -379,6 +380,13 @@ u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_nodes_per_socket);
>  
> +/* this function returns the number of cores per compute unit */
> +u32 amd_get_cores_per_cu(void)
> +{
> +	return cores_per_cu;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_cores_per_cu);
> +
>  static void srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> @@ -506,6 +514,13 @@ static void bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		/* A random value per boot for bit slice [12:upper_bit) */
>  		va_align.bits = get_random_int() & va_align.mask;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (cpu_has_topoext) {
> +		u32 cpuid;
> +
> +		cpuid = cpuid_ebx(0x8000001e);
> +		cores_per_cu += ((cpuid >> 8) & 3);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ