[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150827.113823.214019265460582055.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us, edumazet@...gle.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, tom@...bertland.com, azhou@...ira.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, ipm@...rality.org.uk,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
anton@....ibm.com, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by
walking all the percpu data at once
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:07:33 +0530
> @@ -4641,10 +4647,12 @@ static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64 *stats, void __percpu *mib,
> static void snmp6_fill_stats(u64 *stats, struct inet6_dev *idev, int attrtype,
> int bytes)
> {
> + u64 buff[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX] = {0,};
> +
> switch (attrtype) {
> case IFLA_INET6_STATS:
> - __snmp6_fill_stats64(stats, idev->stats.ipv6,
I would suggest using an explicit memset() here, it makes the overhead incurred
by this scheme clearer.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists