lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150827224719.GE3596@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:47:19 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Raphaƫl Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] perf tools: Add tracing_path and remove unneeded
 functions

On Wed, 26 Aug, at 03:46:44PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> There's no need for find_tracing_dir, because perf already
> searches for debugfs/tracefs mount on start and populate
> tracing_events_path.
 
I'm getting a bit lost searching through the git history of these
functions. Why is it safe to delete these functions? Where did the old
user that required find_tracing_dir() to mount debugfs disappear to?

The code to do the mount of debugfs/tracefs when perf starts appears
to have been around for years. Is the mounting operation of
find_tracing_dir() just dead code?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ