[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150827224719.GE3596@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:47:19 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Raphaƫl Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] perf tools: Add tracing_path and remove unneeded
functions
On Wed, 26 Aug, at 03:46:44PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> There's no need for find_tracing_dir, because perf already
> searches for debugfs/tracefs mount on start and populate
> tracing_events_path.
I'm getting a bit lost searching through the git history of these
functions. Why is it safe to delete these functions? Where did the old
user that required find_tracing_dir() to mount debugfs disappear to?
The code to do the mount of debugfs/tracefs when perf starts appears
to have been around for years. Is the mounting operation of
find_tracing_dir() just dead code?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists