[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11332.1440757434@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:23:54 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Module signing broken after SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION commit?
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> [ 31.829322] PKCS7: Unknown OID: [32] 2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.3
> [ 31.829328] PKCS7: Unknown OID: [180] 2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.3
OID_sha1, /* 1.3.14.3.2.26 */
OID_sha256, /* 2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1 */
I suspect I'm missing something here in oid_registry.h. Looking online, I
see:
id-sha256 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 1 }
id-sha384 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 2 }
id-sha512 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 3 }
id-sha224 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 4 }
id-sha512-224 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 5 }
id-sha512-256 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { hashAlgs 6 }
Are you perchance using sha512 hashes in your signatures?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists