lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077018F4065@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:33:22 +0000
From:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:	"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:	"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"dsahern@...il.com" <dsahern@...il.com>,
	"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/3] perf,tools: get correct cpu id for print_aggr



> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:08:43AM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> >
> > print_aggr fails to print per-core/per-socket statistics after commit
> > 582ec0829b3d ("perf stat: Fix per-socket output bug for uncore
> > events") if events have differnt cpus. Because in print_aggr,
> > aggr_get_id needs index (not cpu id) to find core/pkg id. Also, evsel
> > cpu maps should be used to get aggregated id.
> >
> > Here is an example.
> > Counting events cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/. (Uncore event
> has
> > cpumask 0,18)
> >
> > "perf stat -e cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ -C0,18 --per-core
> > sleep 2"
> >
> > Without this patch, it failes to get CPU 18 result.
> >  Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':
> >
> > S0-C0           1            7526851      cycles
> > S0-C0           1               1.05 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> > S1-C0           0      <not counted>      cycles
> > S1-C0           0      <not counted> MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> >
> > With this patch, it can get both CPU0 and CPU18 result.
> >  Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':
> >
> > S0-C0           1            6327768      cycles
> > S0-C0           1               0.47 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> > S1-C0           1             330228      cycles
> > S1-C0           1               0.29 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> 

Hi Arnaldo,

Could you please merge this patch?
This patch is to fix a bug of perf stat. It doesn't depend on
other patches of the patchset, and can be merged by itself.

Thanks,
Kan

> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since V1
> >  - Modify changelog
> >  - Remove perf_evsel__get_cpumap_index
> >
> >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 37e301a..47c3c1f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static void abs_printout(int id, int nr, struct
> > perf_evsel *evsel, double avg)  static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
> > {
> >  	struct perf_evsel *counter;
> > -	int cpu, cpu2, s, s2, id, nr;
> > +	int cpu, s, s2, id, nr;
> >  	double uval;
> >  	u64 ena, run, val;
> >
> > @@ -707,8 +707,7 @@ static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
> >  			val = ena = run = 0;
> >  			nr = 0;
> >  			for (cpu = 0; cpu < perf_evsel__nr_cpus(counter);
> cpu++) {
> > -				cpu2 = perf_evsel__cpus(counter)-
> >map[cpu];
> > -				s2 = aggr_get_id(evsel_list->cpus, cpu2);
> > +				s2 =
> aggr_get_id(perf_evsel__cpus(counter), cpu);
> >  				if (s2 != id)
> >  					continue;
> >  				val += perf_counts(counter->counts, cpu,
> 0)->val;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ