linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86, efi, kasan: #undef memset/memcpy/memmove per arch.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:43:58 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, efi, kasan: #undef memset/memcpy/memmove per
 arch.

On Fri, 28 Aug, at 02:09:59PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> In not-instrumented code KASAN replaces instrumented
> memset/memcpy/memmove with not-instrumented analogues
> __memset/__memcpy/__memove.
> However, on x86 the EFI stub is not linked with the kernel.
> It uses not-instrumented mem*() functions from
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c
> So we don't replace them with __mem*() variants in EFI stub.
> 
> On ARM64 the EFI stub is linked with the kernel, so we should
> replace mem*() functions with __mem*(), because the EFI stub
> runs before KASAN sets up early shadow.
> 
> So let's move these #undef mem* into arch's asm/efi.h which is
> also included by the EFI stub.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h             | 11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h |  4 ----
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> index 155162e..6862f11 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,17 @@
>  #define EFI32_LOADER_SIGNATURE	"EL32"
>  #define EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE	"EL64"
>  
> +/*
> + * Sometimes we may redefine memset to __memset.
> + * The EFI stub doesn't have __memset() because it's not
> + * linked with the kernel. So we should use standard
> + * memset from arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c
> + * The same applies to memcpy and memmove.
> + */
> +#undef memcpy
> +#undef memset
> +#undef memmove
> +

I think the key piece of information missing in this comment is that
it's redefined for KASAN, right?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
> index e334a01..6b6548f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
> @@ -5,10 +5,6 @@
>  /* error code which can't be mistaken for valid address */
>  #define EFI_ERROR	(~0UL)
>  
> -#undef memcpy
> -#undef memset
> -#undef memmove
> -
>  void efi_char16_printk(efi_system_table_t *, efi_char16_t *);
>  
>  efi_status_t efi_open_volume(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg, void *__image,

Does this patch have any negative consequences for arm64? Can we
safely remove these #undefs without breaking the arm64 EFI stub?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/