linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:17:24 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release
 race

On Fri 28-08-15 07:56:13, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > index 6457a8a0db9c..2c0a817d5dbe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> > @@ -2169,8 +2169,11 @@ int scsi_error_handler(void *data)
> >  	 * We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
> >  	 * disables signal delivery for the created thread.
> >  	 */
> > -	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> > +	while (true) {
> 
> Comment here, I think, please to avoid any other erroneous tidying
> attempts.  How about
> 
> /* 
>  * The sequence in kthread_stop() sets the stop flag first then 
>  * wakes the process.  To avoid missed wakeups, the task should always
>  * be in a non running state before the stop flag is checked
>  */
> 
> Otherwise this looks fine.

I do not have objections to the added comment.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/