[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150828162722.GF11407@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:27:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Raphaƫl Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] perf tools: Add tracing_path and remove unneeded
functions
Em Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:47:19PM +0100, Matt Fleming escreveu:
> On Wed, 26 Aug, at 03:46:44PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > There's no need for find_tracing_dir, because perf already
> > searches for debugfs/tracefs mount on start and populate
> > tracing_events_path.
>
> I'm getting a bit lost searching through the git history of these
> functions. Why is it safe to delete these functions? Where did the old
> user that required find_tracing_dir() to mount debugfs disappear to?
>
> The code to do the mount of debugfs/tracefs when perf starts appears
> to have been around for years. Is the mounting operation of
> find_tracing_dir() just dead code?
It looks like, these things should come after we realize that
tracepoints were requested in record, so we already looked where things
are mounted, etc, without digging deeper I think Jiri's patch is ok.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists