linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to bpf_trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:58:32 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com, hekuang@...wei.com,
	daniel@...earbox.net, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for %s specifier to
 bpf_trace_printk()

On 8/27/15 4:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:06:14 -0700
>>
>>> Fair or you still think it should be per byte copy?
>>
>> I'm terribly surprised we don't have an equivalent of strncpy()
>> for unsafe kernel pointers.
>>
>> You probably won't be the last person to want this, and it's silly
>> to optimize it in one place and then wait for cut&paste into the
>> next guy.
>
> If it doesn't exist. Perhaps its time to create it.

all makes sense. Working on generalizing FETCH_FUNC_NAME
from trace_kprobe.c. Seems to fit quite well.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/