linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] macvtap/macvlan: use IFF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55DFCA7B.8050908@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:42:03 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	vyasevic@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvtap/macvlan: use IFF_NO_QUEUE



On 08/27/2015 06:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:45:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 08/26/2015 12:32 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2015 07:30 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 08/25/2015 06:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:33:12PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> For macvlan, switch to use IFF_NO_QUEUE instead of tx_queue_len = 0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For macvtap, after commit 6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523
>>>>>>> ("macvtap: Add support of packet capture on macvtap
>>>>>>> device."). Multiqueue macvtap suffers from single qdisc lock
>>>>>>> contention. This is because macvtap claims a non zero tx_queue_len and
>>>>>>> it reuses this value as it socket receive queue size.Thanks to
>>>>>>> IFF_NO_QUEUE, we can remove the lock contention without breaking
>>>>>>> existing socket receive queue length logic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>>>>>>> Cc: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>>>>> Seems to make sense. Give me a day or two to get over the jet lag
>>>>> (and get out from under the pile of mail accumulated while I was traveling),
>>>>> I'll review properly and ack.
>>>>>
>>>> A note on this patch: only default qdisc were removed but we don't lose
>>>> the ability to attach a qdisc to macvtap (though it may cause lock
>>>> contention on multiqueue case).
>>>>
>>> Wouldn't that lock contention be solved if we really had multiple queues
>>> for multi-queue macvtaps?
>>>
>>> -vlad
>> Yes, but this introduce another layer of txq locks contention?
> I don't follow - why does it? Could you clarify please?

I believe Vlad wants to remove NETIF_F_LLTX. If yes, core will do an
extra tx lock at macvlan layer.

>
>> And it
>> also needs macvlan multiqueue support. We used to do something like this
>> but switch to NETIF_F_LLTX finally. You may refer:
>>
>> 2c11455321f37da6fe6cc36353149f9ac9183334 macvlan: add multiqueue capability
>> 8ffab51b3dfc54876f145f15b351c41f3f703195 macvlan: lockless tx path
> My concern is that the moment someone configures a non-standard qdisc
> scalability suddenly disappears. That would also be tricky to debug in the
> field as not a lot of developers use non-standard qdiscs.
> What do you think?

Probably not an issue. Non-standard qdisc may need be attached manually
after device creation, and we don't lose this ability with this patch.
(Unless somebody changes default_qdisc). Actually, user before
6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523 does not expect any qdisc work
for macvtap like other stacked devices. This patch also restore this.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/