[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440798506.14237.107.camel@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:48:26 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"boaz@...xistor.com" <boaz@...xistor.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] x86, pmem: push fallback handling to arch code
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 14:47 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 21:34 +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> [..]
> > > -#define ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM MEMREMAP_WB
> >
> > Should it be better to do:
> >
> > #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API */
> > #define ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM MEMREMAP_WT
> >
> > so that you can remove all '#ifdef ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM' stuff?
>
> Yeah, that seems like a nice incremental cleanup for memremap_pmem()
> to just unconditionally use ARCH_MEMREMAP_PMEM, feel free to send it
> along.
OK. Will do.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists