[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHpGcMJT0kQyrvCkur0csCmRn-LwUOJcRWqAfLaqCpNd2b8UXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:06:22 +0200
From: Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API Mailing List <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 10/40] richacl: Permission check algorithm
2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * We don't care which class the process is in when the acl is
>> + * not masked.
>> + */
>> + in_owner_or_group_class = 1;
>
> So why bother setting it at all, then? Oh, I see, it lets you break out
> of the loop below earlier. OK.
Comment changed to:
/*
* When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if
* the process is in the group class and we can earlier break
* out of the loop below.
*/
> Patch makes sense to me, ACK.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists