lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:44:18 -0700
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
CC:	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get()

It's possible to have gpio chips hanging off unreliable remote buses
where the get() operation will fail to acquire a readout of the current
gpio state. Propagate these errors to the consumer so that they can
act on, retry or ignore these failing reads, instead of treating them as
the line being held high.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 3b5e516298e0..dc17dbf8c234 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1173,15 +1173,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_is_active_low);
  * that the GPIO was actually requested.
  */
 
-static bool _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
+static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
-	bool value;
 	int offset;
+	int value;
 
 	chip = desc->chip;
 	offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
-	value = chip->get ? chip->get(chip, offset) : false;
+	value = chip->get ? chip->get(chip, offset) : -EIO;
+	value = value < 0 ? value : !!value;
 	trace_gpio_value(desc_to_gpio(desc), 1, value);
 	return value;
 }
@@ -1191,7 +1192,7 @@ static bool _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
  * @desc: gpio whose value will be returned
  *
  * Return the GPIO's raw value, i.e. the value of the physical line disregarding
- * its ACTIVE_LOW status.
+ * its ACTIVE_LOW status, or negative errno on failure.
  *
  * This function should be called from contexts where we cannot sleep, and will
  * complain if the GPIO chip functions potentially sleep.
@@ -1211,7 +1212,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_raw_value);
  * @desc: gpio whose value will be returned
  *
  * Return the GPIO's logical value, i.e. taking the ACTIVE_LOW status into
- * account.
+ * account, or negative errno on failure.
  *
  * This function should be called from contexts where we cannot sleep, and will
  * complain if the GPIO chip functions potentially sleep.
@@ -1225,6 +1226,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 	WARN_ON(desc->chip->can_sleep);
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
+	if (value < 0)
+		return value;
+
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
 		value = !value;
 
@@ -1547,7 +1551,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_unlock_as_irq);
  * @desc: gpio whose value will be returned
  *
  * Return the GPIO's raw value, i.e. the value of the physical line disregarding
- * its ACTIVE_LOW status.
+ * its ACTIVE_LOW status, or negative errno on failure.
  *
  * This function is to be called from contexts that can sleep.
  */
@@ -1565,7 +1569,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep);
  * @desc: gpio whose value will be returned
  *
  * Return the GPIO's logical value, i.e. taking the ACTIVE_LOW status into
- * account.
+ * account, or negative errno on failure.
  *
  * This function is to be called from contexts that can sleep.
  */
@@ -1578,6 +1582,9 @@ int gpiod_get_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 		return 0;
 
 	value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
+	if (value < 0)
+		return value;
+
 	if (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags))
 		value = !value;
 
-- 
1.8.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ