| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55E0F179.2020601@rock-chips.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 07:40:41 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...gle.com>,
Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] DMA: pl330: support burst mode for dev-to-mem and
mem-to-dev transmit
在 2015/8/29 2:19, Sonny Rao 写道:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> 在 2015/8/27 20:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>>
>>> 2015-08-27 17:48 GMT+09:00 Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds to support burst mode for dev-to-mem and
>>>> mem-to-dev transmit.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@...sung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>>>> cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>>>> cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>>>> cc: Olof Johansson <olofj@...gle.com>
>>>> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> For the entire patchset: I would prefer to see someone's
>>> reviewed/tested tag in his response. Sending a version 1 of patchset
>>> (regardless of Boojin Kim's work two years ago) with such tag could
>>> mean anything. I cannot verify it easily (unless digging somewhere...
>>> or asking people). You could add for example: Reviewed-by Santa Claus.
>>> Should I sent a letter to him asking for confirmation? :)
>>>
>>
>> :) yes, you are right. I should comply with the rule, even if the patchest
>> had been reviewed or tested by someone on another tree.
>
> Hi, yeah I reviewed on a different tree, so you shouldn't put that tag
> here, thanks for removing it.
> I can re-review if you'd like.
>
Hi, sunny, Thanks for reply.
It's very great if you can help me re-review the patchset here. :)
>>
>>
>>> More seriously - reviewed-by is a statement (please look at
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches) and you cannot force someone to make
>>> that statement. He must make such statement on his own.
>>>
>>> That's all from my side since I don't feel skilled enough to review the
>>> code.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>>>> index ecab4ea0..0d544d2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>>>> @@ -1141,10 +1141,13 @@ static inline int _ldst_devtomem(unsigned
>>>> dry_run, u8 buf[],
>>>> const struct _xfer_spec *pxs, int cyc)
>>>> {
>>>> int off = 0;
>>>> + enum pl330_cond cond;
>>>> +
>>>> + cond = (pxs->desc->rqcfg.brst_len == 1) ? SINGLE : BURST;
>>>>
>>>> while (cyc--) {
>>>> - off += _emit_WFP(dry_run, &buf[off], SINGLE,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> - off += _emit_LDP(dry_run, &buf[off], SINGLE,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> + off += _emit_WFP(dry_run, &buf[off], cond,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> + off += _emit_LDP(dry_run, &buf[off], cond,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> off += _emit_ST(dry_run, &buf[off], ALWAYS);
>>>> off += _emit_FLUSHP(dry_run, &buf[off],
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1156,11 +1159,14 @@ static inline int _ldst_memtodev(unsigned
>>>> dry_run, u8 buf[],
>>>> const struct _xfer_spec *pxs, int cyc)
>>>> {
>>>> int off = 0;
>>>> + enum pl330_cond cond;
>>>> +
>>>> + cond = (pxs->desc->rqcfg.brst_len == 1) ? SINGLE : BURST;
>>>>
>>>> while (cyc--) {
>>>> - off += _emit_WFP(dry_run, &buf[off], SINGLE,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> + off += _emit_WFP(dry_run, &buf[off], cond,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> off += _emit_LD(dry_run, &buf[off], ALWAYS);
>>>> - off += _emit_STP(dry_run, &buf[off], SINGLE,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> + off += _emit_STP(dry_run, &buf[off], cond,
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> off += _emit_FLUSHP(dry_run, &buf[off],
>>>> pxs->desc->peri);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2557,7 +2563,7 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
>>>> *pl330_prep_dma_cyclic(
>>>>
>>>> desc->rqtype = direction;
>>>> desc->rqcfg.brst_size = pch->burst_sz;
>>>> - desc->rqcfg.brst_len = 1;
>>>> + desc->rqcfg.brst_len = pch->burst_len;
>>>> desc->bytes_requested = period_len;
>>>> fill_px(&desc->px, dst, src, period_len);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2702,7 +2708,7 @@ pl330_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct
>>>> scatterlist *sgl,
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> desc->rqcfg.brst_size = pch->burst_sz;
>>>> - desc->rqcfg.brst_len = 1;
>>>> + desc->rqcfg.brst_len = pch->burst_len;
>>>> desc->rqtype = direction;
>>>> desc->bytes_requested = sg_dma_len(sg);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.3.7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Shawn Lin
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists