[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440857473.8932.146.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 07:11:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] task_work: remove fifo ordering guarantee
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 06:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Now we also could question why we needed commit
> 4a9d4b024a3102fc083c925c242d98ac27b1c5f6 ("switch fput to task_work_add
> ") since it seems quite an overhead at task exit with 10^6 of files to
> close.
>
> I understood the 'schedule_work() for interrupt/kernel_thread callers'
> part, but not the task_work_add() one.
If this needs to be kept, maybe then add following, to make sure
we flush the list at most every BITS_PER_LONG files
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 6c672ad329e9..f3d0a79cef05 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
int sysctl_nr_open __read_mostly = 1024*1024;
int sysctl_nr_open_min = BITS_PER_LONG;
@@ -392,6 +393,7 @@ static struct fdtable *close_files(struct
files_struct * files)
i++;
set >>= 1;
}
+ task_work_run();
}
return fdt;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists