[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440818791.8932.128.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:26:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
tom@...bertland.com, azhou@...ira.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
ipm@...rality.org.uk, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@....ibm.com,
nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by
walking all the percpu data at once
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 08:27 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> /* Use put_unaligned() because stats may not be aligned for u64. */
> put_unaligned(items, &stats[0]);
> for (i = 1; i < items; i++)
> - put_unaligned(snmp_fold_field64(mib, i, syncpoff), &stats[i]);
> + put_unaligned(buff[i], &stats[i]);
>
I believe Joe suggested following code instead :
buff[0] = items;
memcpy(stats, buff, items * sizeof(u64));
Also please move buff[] array into __snmp6_fill_stats64() to make it
clear it is used in a 'leaf' function.
(even if calling memcpy()/memset() makes it not a leaf function)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists