[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1440819361-20251-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:36:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 9/9] rcu: Change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around GCC bug 67055
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Code like this in inline functions confuses some recent versions of gcc:
const int n = const-expr;
whatever_t array[n];
For more details, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055#c13
This compiler bug results in the following failure after 114b7fd4b (rcu:
Create rcu_sync infrastructure):
In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:429:0,
from include/linux/rcu_sync.h:5,
from kernel/rcu/sync.c:1:
include/linux/rcutiny.h: In function 'rcu_barrier_sched':
include/linux/rcutiny.h:55:20: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
static inline void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
This commit therefore eliminates the constant local variable in favor of
direct use of the expression.
Reported-and-tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index ff476515f716..581abf848566 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
#define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
-do { \
- call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
- const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
- struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
- \
- __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
+do { \
+ call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
+ struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array)]; \
+ __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array), \
+ __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
} while (0)
#define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists