[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150831125326.GH29756@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:53:26 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: timing of module MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
Hi, Rusty -
Thanks for your response!
> [...]
> > That patch also moved the MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier call to
> > complete_formation(), which is relatively early to its former
> > do_init_module() call site. It now precedes the parse_args(),
> > mod_sysfs_setup(), and trace_module_load() steps.
>
> Yes, parse_args() can enter the module, so you really want it before
> then.
Understood. (Perhaps mod_sysfs_setup() could sneak in ahead.)
> > Was the latter part of the change intended & necessary? It is
> > negatively impacting systemtap, which was relying on
> > MODULE_STATE_COMING being called from a fairly complete module
> > state - just before the actual initializer function call.
> Notifiers suck for stuff like this :( Module state has many steps,
> so my preference has been to open-code explicit hooks. [...]
You mean something like the trace_module_load()? (We will probably
experiment with hooking into that tracepoint instead of the notifier.)
A more hard-coded one with an in-kernel callee probably wouldn't help
module-resident clients like us.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists